{"id":28889,"date":"2026-09-24T06:09:38","date_gmt":"2026-09-24T05:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/"},"modified":"2026-09-24T07:47:45","modified_gmt":"2026-09-24T06:47:45","slug":"fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/","title":{"rendered":"Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy"},"content":{"rendered":"

So, did the British army<\/a> deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it’s highly unlikely they deliberately<\/em> initiated a widespread, targeted biological attack in the way we might imagine today. However, the situation was far from simple, and the line between deliberate malice and criminal negligence, or even just a terrible misunderstanding fuelled by fear and desperation, is blurred. The story involves a very real outbreak of smallpox, a desperate military commander, and a tragic exchange that has had lasting consequences.<\/p>\n

The Crucible of Conflict: Fort Pitt in 1763<\/h2>\n

The year 1763 was a powder keg. The French and Indian War, part of the larger Seven Years’ War, had finally concluded with a British victory. But this victory brought new problems. The colonists, eager to expand westward<\/a>, were increasingly clashing with Indigenous nations who felt their lands were being encroached upon. This simmering resentment boiled over into what we now call Pontiac’s Rebellion, a widespread uprising across the Great Lakes region and Ohio Valley.<\/p>\n

Fort Pitt, situated at the strategic confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers, found itself a vital British stronghold and a flashpoint for these tensions. The fort was surrounded by a hostile environment, with Indigenous war parties frequently on the move. Supplies were often scarce, and the soldiers inside, as well as the civilians sheltering within its walls, lived under constant threat.<\/p>\n

A Desperate Situation at the Fort<\/h3>\n

The commander of Fort Pitt at this time was Colonel Henry Bouquet. Bouquet was a Swiss mercenary in British service, a seasoned soldier who had proven his mettle in previous campaigns. He was known for his professionalism and his pragmatism, but also, perhaps, for his rather unsentimental view of the Indigenous peoples he was fighting against.<\/p>\n

By the summer of 1763, the situation at Fort Pitt was dire. Siege lines were drawn, and the fort was effectively cut off from resupply. Food was running low, and the constant threat of attack, coupled with the dwindling resources, was taking a significant toll on the morale of the garrison and the refugees. Bouquet was receiving reports of horrific violence against colonial settlements, and the fear of a similar fate for those within the fort was palpable.<\/p>\n

The Shadow of Disease<\/h3>\n

Compounding the anxieties of war was the ever-present threat of disease. In the crowded, often unsanitary conditions of a frontier fort, especially one under siege, outbreaks of illness were common. Smallpox, in particular, was a devastating scourge that had ravaged populations across the globe for centuries. It was highly contagious and often fatal.<\/p>\n

While the exact medical understanding of disease transmission was still developing, it was understood that close contact with infected individuals could spread illness. However, the concept of using disease as a deliberate weapon was not as sophisticated or widespread as it might be perceived today.<\/p>\n

The Infamous Exchange: A Proposal and a Gift<\/h2>\n

It is within this context of intense pressure, fear, and uncertainty that the controversial event at Fort Pitt took place. We have documented evidence of a conversation between Colonel Bouquet and some visiting Indigenous leaders. This conversation, and a subsequent action, is the crux of the controversy.<\/p>\n

The Meeting with the Delegations<\/h3>\n

In June 1763, delegations from various Indigenous nations, some participating in Pontiac’s Rebellion and others seeking to negotiate peace, arrived at Fort Pitt. The precise nature of these meetings is debated, but it’s clear that Bouquet was attempting to gauge the intentions of the Indigenous leaders and to explore possibilities for de-escalation, while also maintaining a strong defensive posture.<\/p>\n

Accounts from Bouquet’s own letters, as well as from other colonial sources, detail these interactions. It’s important to remember that these accounts are from the perspective of the British, and therefore might be biased. However, they provide the primary evidence for what transpired.<\/p>\n

The Smallpox Blankets<\/h3>\n

The most contentious point arises from a specific proposal discussed during these meetings. According to Bouquet’s own correspondence, he met with two Indigenous emissaries, identified as “friendly” by the British. During this meeting, the discussion turned to the threat of smallpox.<\/p>\n

Bouquet, in a letter to his superior, Major General Jeffrey Amherst (who was notably more hardline in his approach to Indigenous peoples), wrote about the situation at Fort Pitt. He expressed his concern about the potential for smallpox to spread amongst the Indigenous population, which, he theorized, could be a highly effective way to incapacitate them.<\/p>\n

He then explicitly mentioned a conversation he had with his officers about offering gifts to the visiting Indigenous people, and specifically suggested that they “could be given blankets and shirts, and it is possible that this might have the effect of imparting the smallpox to them.” This is thesmoking gun for those who believe the British deliberately initiated the outbreak.<\/p>\n

The Immediate Aftermath: A Spreading Sickness<\/h2>\n

Following this exchange, the narrative takes a darker turn. While the precise chain of events and the degree of intentionality remain points of contention among historians, what is undeniable is that smallpox did indeed break out amongst the Indigenous communities near Fort Pitt shortly after these meetings.<\/p>\n

The “Gift” of Blankets<\/h3>\n

The critical element here is the understanding (or lack thereof) of smallpox transmission at the time. While the concept of contagion was emerging, the idea of purposefully infecting someone with a disease was still quite rudimentary. It’s plausible that the blankets mentioned in Bouquet’s letter were not necessarily “infected” in a laboratory sense, but rather came from individuals who were already ill with smallpox within the fort.<\/p>\n

Fort Pitt, like any garrison town of the era, was susceptible to outbreaks of infectious diseases. It is entirely possible that smallpox was already present within the fort’s population, perhaps among the soldiers or the civilian refugees. If infected individuals or their bedding were the source of the contagion, then distributing such items to visiting delegations would inevitably lead to transmission.<\/p>\n

The Devastation Unfolds<\/h3>\n

Regardless of the exact method of transmission, the consequences were devastating. Smallpox swept through the Indigenous villages, claiming a heavy toll. Entire communities were decimated, and the social structures of many nations were severely disrupted. The disease was particularly deadly to populations with no prior exposure or immunity, making it a catastrophic blow.<\/p>\n

The timing of the outbreak, so soon after the discussions at Fort Pitt, fueled suspicion and resentment among the Indigenous peoples. For many, it seemed too coincidental, reinforcing existing fears and distrust of the British. This event further inflamed the already volatile situation and contributed to the prolonged nature of Pontiac’s Rebellion.<\/p>\n

The Debate Among Historians: Intent vs. Negligence<\/h2>\n

The question of whether Colonel Bouquet and the British army deliberately<\/em> set out to commit genocide through biological warfare is a subject of ongoing historical debate. The evidence is not as clear-cut as some might wish, and the interpretation of historical documents is crucial.<\/p>\n

Arguments for Deliberate Action<\/h3>\n

Proponents of the deliberate action theory point directly to Bouquet’s letter. They argue that his words clearly indicate an intent to “impart the smallpox.” The fact that he discussed this with his officers and then, allegedly, proceeded to distribute items that could carry the disease, is seen as strong evidence of malice. Furthermore, they highlight the broader context of colonial warfare, where brutality and dehumanization of Indigenous peoples were not uncommon. The idea of using disease as a weapon, even if rudimentary, fits within this broader narrative of violent subjugation.<\/p>\n

Arguments for Negligence and Miscalculation<\/h3>\n

On the other side of the debate are historians who argue that while the outcome was tragic, the intent was not necessarily a premeditated act of biological warfare. They emphasize the limited medical understanding of the time. It’s possible that Bouquet, facing extreme pressure, saw smallpox as a potential “advantage” in a brutal conflict, without fully grasping the devastating implications of transmission through contaminated items.<\/p>\n

This perspective suggests that the British may have been aware of the presence of smallpox in the fort and, in a desperate attempt to gain an upper hand, made a reckless and unethical decision to distribute potentially contaminated items, without a full understanding of the contagiousness or without any intention of orchestrating a large-scale epidemic. It could be seen as a case of criminal negligence born out of desperation and a lack of scientific understanding, rather than a calculated genocide.<\/p>\n

Another point raised is the possibility of independent spread. Smallpox could have been present in the wider region, and the distribution of blankets might have simply facilitated its spread, rather than initiated it. However, the timing and the specific mention in Bouquet’s letter make this less likely to be the sole cause.<\/p>\n

The Enduring Legacy: Trust and Trauma<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Year<\/th>\nEvent<\/th>\nLocation<\/th>\nNumber of Individuals Affected<\/th>\nType of Smallpox Exposure<\/th>\nControversy Details<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1763<\/td>\nDistribution of Smallpox-infected Blankets<\/td>\nFort Pitt (present-day Pittsburgh)<\/td>\nUnknown (Native American tribes)<\/td>\nDeliberate exposure via contaminated blankets<\/td>\nBritish officers allegedly gave smallpox-infected blankets to Native Americans during Pontiac’s War as a form of biological warfare.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1763<\/td>\nSmallpox Outbreak Among Native Tribes<\/td>\nOhio Valley Region<\/td>\nThousands (estimated)<\/td>\nNatural and possibly deliberate exposure<\/td>\nDebate over whether the outbreak was caused by natural spread or intentional infection from Fort Pitt.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1764<\/td>\nBritish Military Correspondence<\/td>\nFort Pitt<\/td>\nN\/A<\/td>\nN\/A<\/td>\nLetters between British officers discussing the use of smallpox as a weapon, including correspondence from Captain Simeon Ecuyer.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Modern Analysis<\/td>\nHistorical and Epidemiological Studies<\/td>\nVarious<\/td>\nN\/A<\/td>\nN\/A<\/td>\nScholars debate the effectiveness and ethical implications of the alleged biological warfare at Fort Pitt.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The Fort Pitt smallpox controversy, regardless of the precise intent, has left a deep and lasting scar on the relationship between Indigenous peoples and the descendants of colonial powers. It has become a powerful symbol of broken trust and the horrific consequences of colonial ambition.<\/p>\n

Fueling Distrust and Resentment<\/h3>\n

For many Indigenous communities, the event serves as a stark reminder of the disregard for their lives and well-being shown by colonial forces. The idea that disease, a natural enemy, could be weaponized against them cemented a deep-seated distrust that has endured for generations. This historical trauma continues to impact relationships and perceptions to this day.<\/p>\n

A Cautionary Tale<\/h3>\n

The story of Fort Pitt and the smallpox controversy is more than just a historical footnote. It\u2019s a complex and somber narrative that highlights the devastating human cost of conflict, the dangers of unchecked power, and the profound consequences of scientific ignorance. It serves as a cautionary tale about the ethical responsibilities that come with warfare and the importance of understanding the full impact of our actions, both intended and unintended, on others. The lines between deliberate malice, desperate measures, and sheer ignorance are often blurred in the fog of war, but the suffering caused by the spread of smallpox at Fort Pitt is a brutal and undeniable reality.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

FAQs<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n

What was Fort Pitt?<\/h3>\n

Fort Pitt was a British fort built in 1758 during the French and Indian War. It was located at the confluence of the Monongahela and Allegheny rivers in what is now Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n

What was the Smallpox Controversy at Fort Pitt?<\/h3>\n

During the Siege of Fort Pitt in 1763, there was an outbreak of smallpox among Native American tribes who were attacking the fort. British soldiers at the fort reportedly gave blankets infected with smallpox to the Native Americans as a form of biological warfare.<\/p>\n

Was the use of smallpox as a weapon confirmed?<\/h3>\n

Historians have debated the extent to which smallpox was intentionally used as a weapon at Fort Pitt. While there is evidence that infected blankets were distributed, it is unclear whether this was a deliberate act of biological warfare or a result of negligence.<\/p>\n

What were the consequences of the Smallpox Controversy at Fort Pitt?<\/h3>\n

The smallpox outbreak at Fort Pitt had devastating consequences for the Native American tribes in the region. It is estimated that thousands of Native Americans died as a result of the disease, leading to a significant population decline.<\/p>\n

How is the Smallpox Controversy at Fort Pitt viewed today?<\/h3>\n

The Smallpox Controversy at Fort Pitt is viewed as a dark chapter in the history of colonial America<\/a>. It serves as a reminder of the devastating impact of disease and the ethical considerations surrounding biological warfare.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"yoast_wpseo_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"yoast_wpseo_metadesc":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"rank_math_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"_rank_math_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"rank_math_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"_rank_math_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"aioseo_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"_aioseo_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"aioseo_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"_aioseo_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"seopress_titles_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"_seopress_titles_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"seopress_titles_desc":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"_seopress_titles_desc":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"genesis_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"_genesis_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"genesis_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"_genesis_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"sq_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"_sq_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"sq_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"_sq_description":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"wds_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"_wds_title":["Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\r"],"wds_metadesc":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"_wds_metadesc":["So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they.."],"linksy_active_local_suggestions":["a:2:{s:7:\"link-in\";b:0;s:8:\"link-out\";b:1;}"]},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history"],"yoast_head":"\nFort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they..\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they..\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-24T05:09:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-24T06:47:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy","description":"So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they..","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy","og_description":"So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they..","og_url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/","og_site_name":"Earth Site Education","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/","article_published_time":"2026-09-24T05:09:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-24T06:47:45+00:00","author":"Earth Site Education","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Earth Site Education","Estimated reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/"},"author":{"name":"Earth Site Education","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819"},"headline":"Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy","datePublished":"2026-09-24T05:09:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-24T06:47:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/"},"wordCount":2046,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"articleSection":["History"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/","name":"Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-09-24T05:09:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-24T06:47:45+00:00","description":"So, did the British army deliberately try to infect Native Americans with smallpox at Fort Pitt? The short answer is, it's highly unlikely they..","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/fort-pitt-and-the-smallpox-controversy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fort Pitt and the Smallpox Controversy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","name":"Earth Site Education","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization","name":"Earth Site Education","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","width":800,"height":800,"caption":"Earth Site Education"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819","name":"Earth Site Education","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Earth Site Education"},"url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/author\/keirearthsiteadmin-7\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28889"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28889\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28894,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28889\/revisions\/28894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}