{"id":29007,"date":"2026-09-25T06:09:50","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T05:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/"},"modified":"2026-09-25T07:24:57","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T06:24:57","slug":"jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/","title":{"rendered":"Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows"},"content":{"rendered":"

The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he did. This isn’t a modern reinterpretation or a vague rumour; it’s documented in his own correspondence and the replies he received. The details, as we’ll explore, paint a disturbing picture of eighteenth-century colonial warfare and attitudes.<\/p>\n

The Lingering Question: Did He or Didn’t He?<\/h2>\n

For a long time, particularly in popular narratives, the suggestion that Jeffrey Amherst, a prominent British commander during the French and Indian War, advocated for germ warfare was either ignored, downplayed, or dismissed as an unproven accusation. However, serious historical inquiry, drawing directly from primary sources, leaves little room for doubt. The evidence is not hidden; it’s there in the official records of the era, specifically in the correspondence between Amherst and his subordinate, Colonel Henry Bouquet. Understanding the context of this exchange is crucial to grasping its significance. This wasn’t a casual remark but a direct suggestion made during a period of intense conflict and rising tensions.<\/p>\n

Setting the Scene: Pontiac’s War<\/h3>\n

To properly understand Amherst’s proposal, we need to situate it within the historical context of Pontiac’s War<\/a> (1763-1766). This conflict, also known as Pontiac’s Rebellion, erupted shortly after the British victory in the French and Indian War (known as the Seven Years’ War in Europe). While Britain had secured vast new territories in North America, this came at a significant cost to the Native American nations who lived there. The French had maintained a more conciliatory approach to relations and trade, often engaging in diplomacy and respecting existing land claims.<\/p>\n

When the British took over, their policies were markedly different. They cut back on gifts and tribute, which had been a traditional component of Indigenous diplomacy and alliances. They also began to encroach more aggressively on Native American lands, and their trade policies were often seen as exploitative. Furthermore, the British military presence in the Great Lakes region and Ohio Valley was perceived as a direct threat to Indigenous sovereignty and way of life.<\/p>\n

The Ottawa leader Pontiac, along with other influential figures, managed to forge a broad coalition of various Native American nations, including the Ottawa, Ojibwe, Potawatomi, Huron, Delaware, Shawnee, and Seneca. Their objective was to drive the British out of their territories and resist further colonial expansion. The war began in May 1763 with coordinated attacks on several British forts and settlements across the Great Lakes region and the Ohio Country. Several forts fell quickly, and British garrisons were massacred, demonstrating the ferocity and effectiveness of the Native American resistance. It was against this backdrop of widespread, successful Indigenous uprisings that Amherst’s infamous correspondence took place.<\/p>\n

The Incriminating Correspondence<\/h2>\n

The core evidence for Amherst’s smallpox proposal lies in a series of letters exchanged in mid-1763. These aren’t isolated remarks but part of a documented discussion about military strategy during a time of crisis for the British.<\/p>\n

Bouquet’s Initial Suggestion<\/h3>\n

The first piece of the puzzle comes from a letter written by Colonel Henry Bouquet to Amherst on 13 July 1763. Bouquet, commanding at Fort Pitt (modern-day Pittsburgh), was under immense pressure. The fort was besieged by Native American forces, and the situation was dire. In his letter, Bouquet suggested a desperate measure to combat the besiegers:<\/p>\n

“Could it not be contrived to Send the Small Pox among those disaffected Tribes of Indians? We must on this occasion use every stratagem in our power to reduce them.”<\/p>\n

This suggestion, while chilling, needs to be seen in the context of the medical knowledge and military desperation of the time. Smallpox was a devastating disease, and its impact on populations with no acquired immunity was well-known. Bouquet was essentially suggesting a biological attack, even if the precise mechanisms of disease transmission were not fully understood in modern terms. He was aware of the devastating potential of the disease and saw it as a “stratagem.”<\/p>\n

Amherst’s Explicit Endorsement<\/h3>\n

Amherst’s reply to Bouquet, dated 16 July 1763, is the most damning piece of evidence. In it, he responds directly to Bouquet’s suggestion, not with condemnation or hesitation, but with clear approval and even an additional, more direct proposal:<\/p>\n

“You will Do well to try to Innoculate the Indians by means of Blankets, as well as to Try Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execrable Race.”<\/p>\n

This statement is unambiguous. Amherst not only endorses Bouquet’s suggestion but escalates it by specifically mentioning “blankets” as a means of transmission \u2013 a method that had been observed to spread disease before. Furthermore, his stated goal is to “Extirpate this Execrable Race.” The language here is crucial; “extirpate” means to completely destroy or wipe out. This isn’t about military victory in a conventional sense; it suggests a desire for ethnic cleansing.<\/p>\n

The Follow-Up: General Gage and John Campbell<\/h3>\n

The discussion didn’t end with Amherst’s reply. The idea was further discussed and seemingly acted upon. On 20 July 1763, Amherst wrote to General Thomas Gage, his successor, who was then in New York. In this letter, Amherst repeats his suggestion, albeit in slightly more veiled terms:<\/p>\n

“I approve very much of your plan of sending the Small Pox among the rascals, and should be glad to know if it meets with success.”<\/p>\n

While not as explicit as his communication with Bouquet, this still shows Amherst’s continued support for the plan and his desire to see it implemented successfully.<\/p>\n

There’s also documented evidence from the period concerning Fort Pitt itself. The journal of William Trent, a trader and militia captain at Fort Pitt, records on 24 June 1763, that two Delaware delegates came to the fort. After their meeting, Trent wrote:<\/p>\n

“We gave them two Blankets and a Handkerchief out of the Small Pox Hospital. I hope it will have the desired effect.”<\/p>\n

This entry, made before<\/em> the exchange of letters between Amherst and Bouquet, suggests that the idea of using smallpox-infected items was already circulating among British officers<\/a> at Fort Pitt. It also provides strong indication that the method discussed by Amherst and Bouquet was actually put into practice. While it’s impossible to definitively link this specific act to Amherst’s direct orders, it certainly aligns with the later discussions and indicates a prevailing mindset among some British military personnel.<\/p>\n

Interpreting the Evidence<\/h2>\n

The primary source documents speak for themselves. Amherst’s words are clear, and his intent to use disease as a weapon to “extirpate” Native Americans is explicitly stated.<\/p>\n

The Question of Implementation and Efficacy<\/h3>\n

While the intent is clear, the actual efficacy and extent of the smallpox-infected blankets as a weapon are harder to precisely quantify. Did the blankets from Fort Pitt cause a widespread smallpox epidemic among the besieging Native American forces? It’s difficult to say with absolute certainty. Records from the era are not precise epidemiological studies. However, smallpox epidemics were indeed devastating to Native American populations throughout this period, who had no natural immunity to the disease. It’s plausible that such actions contributed to outbreaks, even if the scale of impact from this specific incident cannot be isolated from other sources of disease transmission.<\/p>\n

It’s also important to acknowledge that smallpox was endemic in North America by the 18th century, meaning outbreaks could occur through various means of contact. Attributing every epidemic to deliberate biological warfare is an oversimplification. However, the Trent journal entry and the Amherst-Bouquet correspondence demonstrate a clear intention<\/em> to introduce and spread the disease deliberately, regardless of the precise scale of its success in this particular instance. The historical record shows that the British command not only discussed but actively supported the idea of using germ warfare.<\/p>\n

Historical Context vs. Modern Morality<\/h3>\n

Some attempts to defend or downplay Amherst’s actions often invoke the idea that “it was a different time” or that such actions were common practice. While it’s true that warfare in the 18th century was brutal and often involved atrocities on all sides, this does not excuse or diminish the specific nature of Amherst’s proposal. Using disease as a weapon, with the explicit aim of “extirpation,” goes beyond conventional warfare, even by the standards of the time. It represents a deliberate targeting of an entire population group through biological means, a precursor to concepts like ethnic cleansing and genocide.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, even if other commanders might have thought of such tactics, Amherst’s explicit endorsement and desire for “extirpation” stand out. It wasn’t a one-off thought but a calculated strategy discussed among high-ranking officers. While we should avoid anachronism and judging historical figures solely by modern moral codes, we can still recognise that some actions transcend the boundaries of acceptable conduct even within their own historical period, or at the very least, reveal a disturbing moral compass.<\/p>\n

The Enduring Legacy and Controversy<\/h2>\n

The revelations about Amherst’s smallpox proposal have had a significant impact on how he is viewed today, especially in Canada, where he has historically been commemorated.<\/p>\n

Reassessment of Historical Figures<\/h3>\n

For decades, Jeffrey Amherst was largely celebrated as a British military hero<\/a>, instrumental in the conquest of New France and a key figure in British imperial expansion. Cities, towns, streets, and even a university in North America bear his name. However, the widespread acknowledgement of his biological warfare proposal has led to a critical re-evaluation of his legacy.<\/p>\n

This re-evaluation is part of a broader movement to confront the darker aspects of colonial history and to acknowledge the devastating impact of European expansion on Indigenous peoples. It forces societies to confront uncomfortable truths about their founding narratives and the figures they have chosen to honour.<\/p>\n

Calls for Renaming and Removal<\/h3>\n

The controversy surrounding Amherst’s actions has directly led to calls for the renaming of places and institutions bearing his name. In Amherst, Massachusetts, for example, there have been long-running debates about changing the name of the town itself, or at least removing his name from public institutions. Amherst College has also faced pressure to address its namesake’s history. Similarly, in Canada, where Amherst led forces during the French and Indian War, there have been discussions and actions to remove or contextualise his statues and plaques.<\/p>\n

These efforts are not simply about erasing history, as some critics argue. Instead, they are about acknowledging a more complete and accurate historical narrative. It’s about questioning why a figure who advocated for the biological “extirpation” of an entire people should continue to be celebrated without critical acknowledgement of his actions. It\u2019s about recognising that honouring such figures can be deeply offensive and painful to Indigenous communities, whose ancestors were the targets of such policies.<\/p>\n

Implications for Indigenous-Settler Relations<\/h3>\n

The historical evidence of Amherst’s smallpox proposal is particularly significant in the context of contemporary Indigenous-settler relations. For Indigenous communities, this documentation serves as a stark reminder of the genocidal intentions and policies that underpinned much of the colonial project. It validates their long-held narratives of persecution and oppression and underscores the systemic nature of violence they faced.<\/p>\n

Understanding this history is crucial for fostering reconciliation. It requires non-Indigenous populations to confront difficult truths about the past and to acknowledge the profound trauma and injustice inflicted upon Indigenous peoples. It highlights the need for ongoing education, dialogue, and concrete actions to address the enduring legacies of colonialism, which include not only land dispossession but also attempts at cultural and physical annihilation. The Amherst controversy serves as a poignant example of why historical accuracy and ethical reassessment are vital for building a more just and equitable future.<\/p>\n

Beyond Amherst: A Wider Context<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Aspect<\/th>\nDetails<\/th>\nHistorical Evidence<\/th>\nSource\/Reference<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Proposal Date<\/td>\n1763<\/td>\nLetter from Jeffrey Amherst to Colonel Henry Bouquet suggesting use of smallpox-infected blankets<\/td>\nAmherst-Bouquet Correspondence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Intent<\/td>\nBiological warfare against Native American tribes<\/td>\nExplicit mention of spreading smallpox<\/a> to weaken enemy forces<\/td>\nHistorical letters and military records<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Implementation<\/td>\nUnclear if directly executed<\/td>\nSome evidence of distribution of infected items, but no conclusive proof of deliberate infection<\/td>\nContemporary accounts and later historical analysis<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Impact on Native Populations<\/td>\nSevere smallpox outbreaks<\/td>\nHigh mortality rates among indigenous peoples during and after 1763<\/td>\nHistorical demographic studies<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Controversy<\/td>\nEthical and historical debate<\/td>\nDiscussions on whether Amherst’s proposal constitutes genocide or early biological warfare<\/td>\nModern historical scholarship<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

While Amherst’s actions are well-documented and particularly egregious, it’s important to understand that they did not occur in a vacuum. The use of disease as a weapon or the disregard for Indigenous lives<\/a> in general was part of a broader, deeply troubling colonial mindset.<\/p>\n

Prevailing Attitudes Towards Indigenous Peoples<\/h3>\n

During the 18th century, European colonial powers often viewed Indigenous peoples through a dehumanising lens. They were frequently depicted as “savages,” “barbarians,” or “inferior races” in need of “civilisation.” This dehumanisation facilitated the justification of violence, land dispossession, and even attempts at extermination. Such attitudes made it easier for figures like Amherst to contemplate and suggest horrific tactics. When a group of people is deemed “execrable,” as Amherst stated, it becomes simpler to justify extreme measures against them. This racial prejudice was not an exception but often the rule in colonial discourse and policy.<\/p>\n

Smallpox as a “Weapon” \u2013 Intentional or Unintentional<\/h3>\n

Smallpox, tuberculosis, measles, and other European diseases ravaged Indigenous populations across the Americas from the moment of first contact. These epidemics often preceded direct military conquest, weakening Indigenous societies and making them more vulnerable. While many of these early epidemics were unintentional consequences of contact, the devastating impact of these diseases on populations without immunity was widely observed and understood.<\/p>\n

Over time, this understanding morphed into deliberate strategy. While Amherst’s proposal is one of the most explicit examples of intentional biological warfare, there are other instances and suspicions where disease was used or allowed to spread with little intervention. The sheer disparity in death tolls from disease contributed significantly to colonial dominance and demographic shifts, whether the epidemics were intentionally started or merely allowed to run their course due to a lack of concern for Indigenous well-being.<\/p>\n

The Fort Pitt incident<\/a>, however, stands out because it details an explicit proposal, endorsement, and apparent implementation of using infected items with the stated goal of “extirpation.” It moved beyond passive observation of disease spread to active weaponisation. This distinction is crucial when evaluating the morality and historical significance of Amherst’s actions.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

The historical evidence unequivocally shows that Jeffrey Amherst proposed and endorsed the use of smallpox as a weapon against Native Americans during Pontiac’s War, with the stated aim of their “extirpation.” This isn’t a matter of speculation but is documented in his own military correspondence. The letters exchanged between Amherst and Colonel Henry Bouquet in 1763, along with related records, provide chilling insight into the brutal realities of colonial warfare and the dehumanising attitudes prevalent among some British commanders of the era.<\/p>\n

This evidence challenges simplistic celebratory narratives of historical figures like Amherst and compels a critical re-evaluation of their legacies. It underscores the importance of confronting uncomfortable truths about the past, particularly as they relate to the profound and lasting impact of colonialism on Indigenous peoples. Understanding this history is not just an academic exercise; it is fundamental to fostering genuine reconciliation and building more equitable societies today. The controversy surrounding Amherst’s name and statues reflects a broader societal reckoning with historical injustice and the ongoing need to acknowledge the full, often painful, story of colonial expansion.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

FAQs<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n

What was Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal?<\/h3>\n

Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal refers to a series of letters written by British General Jeffrey Amherst in 1763, suggesting the use of smallpox-infected blankets as a means to eradicate Native American populations during the Pontiac War.<\/p>\n

Was Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal implemented?<\/h3>\n

There is historical evidence to suggest that Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal was implemented, as there are reports of smallpox outbreaks among Native American populations during the Pontiac War. However, the extent to which the proposal was carried out remains a topic of debate among historians.<\/p>\n

What was the impact of Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal?<\/h3>\n

The impact of Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal was devastating, as smallpox outbreaks among Native American populations resulted in high mortality rates and contributed to the decline of many tribes during the Pontiac War.<\/p>\n

Was Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal considered ethical at the time?<\/h3>\n

While attitudes towards warfare and the treatment of indigenous populations were different in the 18th century, Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal was controversial even at the time. Some contemporaries condemned the use of biological warfare as unethical and inhumane.<\/p>\n

How is Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal viewed today?<\/h3>\n

Today, Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal is widely condemned as a heinous act of biological warfare and a violation of human rights. It is often cited as an example of the destructive impact of colonialism on indigenous populations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"yoast_wpseo_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"yoast_wpseo_metadesc":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"rank_math_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"_rank_math_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"rank_math_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"_rank_math_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"aioseo_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"_aioseo_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"aioseo_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"_aioseo_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"seopress_titles_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"_seopress_titles_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"seopress_titles_desc":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"_seopress_titles_desc":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"genesis_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"_genesis_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"genesis_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"_genesis_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"sq_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"_sq_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"sq_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"_sq_description":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"wds_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"_wds_title":["Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\r"],"wds_metadesc":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"_wds_metadesc":["The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he.."],"linksy_active_local_suggestions":["a:2:{s:7:\"link-in\";b:0;s:8:\"link-out\";b:1;}"]},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history"],"yoast_head":"\nJeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he..\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he..\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-25T05:09:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-25T06:24:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows","description":"The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he..","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows","og_description":"The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he..","og_url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/","og_site_name":"Earth Site Education","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/","article_published_time":"2026-09-25T05:09:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-25T06:24:57+00:00","author":"Earth Site Education","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Earth Site Education","Estimated reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/"},"author":{"name":"Earth Site Education","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819"},"headline":"Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows","datePublished":"2026-09-25T05:09:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-25T06:24:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/"},"wordCount":2821,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"articleSection":["History"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/","name":"Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-09-25T05:09:50+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-25T06:24:57+00:00","description":"The short answer to whether Jeffrey Amherst proposed using smallpox to harm Native Americans is yes, the historical evidence clearly indicates he..","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/jeffrey-amhersts-smallpox-proposal-what-the-historical-evidence-shows\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jeffrey Amherst\u2019s Smallpox Proposal: What the Historical Evidence Shows"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","name":"Earth Site Education","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization","name":"Earth Site Education","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","width":800,"height":800,"caption":"Earth Site Education"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819","name":"Earth Site Education","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Earth Site Education"},"url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/author\/keirearthsiteadmin-7\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29007"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29009,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29007\/revisions\/29009"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}