{"id":31735,"date":"2026-10-21T00:09:56","date_gmt":"2026-10-20T23:09:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/"},"modified":"2026-10-21T07:54:41","modified_gmt":"2026-10-21T06:54:41","slug":"why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration<\/a>, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find itself voting alongside Russia at the UN. The short answer? It’s often a case of aligning interests on specific resolutions, even amidst broader geopolitical disagreements. Think of it less as a grand strategic alliance and more as a transactional convergence on particular issues where both nations see a benefit in a shared stance, even if their underlying motivations differ significantly. This isn’t necessarily about a pro-Russia sentiment, but rather a reflection of the US’s ‘America First’ approach to international relations, where perceived national interests dictate voting patterns, sometimes leading to unexpected bedfellows.<\/p>\n

Unpacking the UN Resolution: What Was It About?<\/h2>\n

To understand the ‘why’, we first need to know the ‘what’. Assuming a February 2025 scenario, the most likely resolutions to draw a US-Russia alignment often revolve around themes where both nations share a degree of skepticism towards multilateral interventions or a desire to uphold state sovereignty against perceived external pressures. It’s improbable to see such alignment on human rights abuses within a specific country if the US is actively condemning Russia’s actions elsewhere. Instead, the convergence points tend to be more nuanced.<\/p>\n

Potential Areas for Alignment<\/h3>\n

One common area where the US and Russia have occasionally found themselves on the same side is in resolutions concerning the reforming or limiting of certain international bodies’ mandates<\/em>, particularly those perceived to overstep their original purpose or infringe on national sovereignty. For example, a resolution seeking to grant more power to a specific UN committee without explicit member state consent, or one that proposes a significant expansion of a peacekeeping mission into a highly sensitive region without clear host nation approval, could be a point of convergence.<\/p>\n

Another strong possibility lies in resolutions critical of broad, sweeping sanctions regimes<\/em> not explicitly mandated by the UN Security Council, or those perceived to be unilaterally imposed by a bloc of nations. Both the US and Russia, at different times and for different reasons, have expressed reservations about the efficacy and fairness of certain sanction mechanisms. A resolution calling for a more equitable and UN-centric approach to international sanctions could thus find both countries voting in tandem, albeit with divergent justifications for doing so. Russia might see it as a pushback against Western-led sanctions, while the US might frame it as a reassertion of its own sovereign right to decide on such measures without external pressure, or a desire to re-evaluate what it considers ineffective previous policies.<\/p>\n

Finally, resolutions related to the structure and funding of the UN itself<\/em> can be a fertile ground for such alliances. Both nations, for different reasons, have at various points been critical of the UN’s bureaucracy, spending, or perceived inefficiencies. A resolution proposing significant budgetary cuts, a restructuring of certain departments, or a re-evaluation of contribution scales could see both the US and Russia voting in favour, driven by their respective domestic pressures for fiscal responsibility or a desire to reshape the organisation to better serve their interests.<\/p>\n

Trump’s ‘America First’ Doctrine in Practice<\/h2>\n

The return of a Trump administration would invariably mean a renewed emphasis<\/a> on the ‘America First’ foreign policy doctrine. This isn’t a new concept, but its application at the UN often translates into a highly transactional approach to international relations. Every vote, every alliance, and every commitment is scrutinised through the lens of direct benefit to the United States.<\/p>\n

Prioritising National Interests Over Multilateralism<\/h3>\n

Under ‘America First’, the traditional emphasis on multilateral institutions and consensus-building, often championed by previous administrations, takes a backseat. Instead, bilateral relationships and perceived immediate national gains become the driving force. At the UN, this means the US is less likely to compromise on its perceived interests purely for the sake of international harmony or to uphold established norms, especially if those norms are seen as detrimental to American sovereignty or economic well-being.<\/p>\n

This approach can lead to surprising alignments. If a resolution, regardless of its origin or broader implications, is perceived to serve a specific US interest \u2013 perhaps by weakening a rival’s influence, reducing financial commitments, or reasserting American autonomy \u2013 then the administration would likely vote in favour. The identity of other “yes” votes, be it Russia or another nation typically seen as an adversary, becomes secondary to the perceived benefit to the US.<\/p>\n

Skepticism Towards International Institutions<\/h3>\n

A core tenet of ‘America First’ is a deep-seated skepticism towards many international institutions, including aspects of the UN. This isn’t necessarily an outright rejection, but rather a belief that these bodies are often inefficient, biased, or attempt to impose policies that infringe upon national sovereignty. This skepticism translates into a willingness to challenge established norms, question long-standing commitments, and re-evaluate the US’s participation or financial contributions to various UN initiatives.<\/p>\n

When a resolution touches upon these areas of concern \u2013 perhaps proposing an expansion of a UN body’s power, increasing financial contributions, or endorsing policies seen as undermining national control \u2013 the Trump administration would be predisposed to vote against it. If Russia also shares similar reservations, albeit for different geopolitical reasons, a joint “no” or “abstain” vote could easily occur.<\/p>\n

Russia’s Strategic Calculus at the UN<\/h2>\n

Russia’s motivations for its UN voting patterns are complex and deeply rooted in its geopolitical strategy. While the US might operate from an ‘America First’ perspective, Russia often votes to project its influence, challenge Western hegemony, and protect what it perceives as its vital national security interests and sphere of influence.<\/p>\n

Undermining Western Unilateralism<\/h3>\n

A significant aspect of Russia’s UN strategy is to undermine what it views as Western unilateralism and attempts to impose a “rules-based international order” that largely benefits Western powers. Russia frequently champions the principle of state sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs, particularly when these principles can be used to deflect criticism of its own actions or those of its allies.<\/p>\n

Therefore, any resolution that is perceived to be an attempt by a Western bloc to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation, or to establish precedents that could be used against Russia in the future, would almost certainly be opposed by Moscow. If a Trump administration, through its ‘America First’ lens, also sees such a resolution as an overreach of international bodies or an infringement on sovereignty, a shared “no” vote becomes a logical outcome.<\/p>\n

Seeking to Normalise Relations and Gain Leverage<\/h3>\n

Despite ongoing tensions with many Western nations, Russia consistently seeks to normalise its international standing and gain leverage where possible. Voting alongside a major power like the United States, even on a specific, limited resolution, can be seen as a small victory for Moscow. It can be presented domestically as evidence of Russia’s continued relevance on the global stage and its ability to engage constructively with other world powers.<\/p>\n

From a strategic perspective, aligning with the US on certain votes can also be an attempt to drive wedges between the US and its traditional allies, particularly European nations. If the US and Russia vote together on an issue that divides the transatlantic alliance, it serves Russia’s long-term goal of fragmenting Western unity.<\/p>\n

The Specifics of a February 2025 Vote<\/h2>\n

Given the political landscape, it’s possible to speculate on the type of resolution that would lead to a Trump administration voting alongside Russia in February 2025. This isn’t about predicting a precise resolution number, but rather the themes and underlying principles that would facilitate such an alignment.<\/p>\n

Resisting Expansion of UN Sanctions or Oversight<\/h3>\n

One highly plausible scenario would be a resolution attempting to expand the mandate of a UN body to impose or oversee new, broad-based international sanctions against a particular nation or group of nations. The Trump administration has historically been wary of multilateral sanctions frameworks, preferring unilateral measures or targeted bilateral pressure. Russia, for its part, is a frequent target of Western sanctions and consistently advocates for limiting the power of international bodies to impose such measures.<\/p>\n

Therefore, a resolution proposing to give, say, a new UN committee the power to investigate and recommend broad economic sanctions without explicit Security Council approval, or one that seeks to expand the scope of existing sanctions against a country sympathetic to Russia, would likely draw a joint “no” vote. The US would see it as an infringement on its sovereign right to set its own sanctions policy and an overreach of UN authority, while Russia would see it as a direct threat to its allies and a precedent that could be used against it.<\/p>\n

Opposing Certain Humanitarian Intervention Precedents<\/h3>\n

Another potential area of alignment could be a resolution that, in Russia’s eyes, sets a dangerous precedent for humanitarian intervention without explicit host nation consent or strong Security Council backing. Russia has historically used its Security Council veto to block resolutions perceived as enabling “regime change” under the guise of humanitarian protection.<\/p>\n

If a resolution were to propose a non-binding but strongly worded endorsement of a “responsibility to protect” (R2P) interpretation that leans towards broader intervention, or seeks to establish a framework for intervention in a highly sensitive region without clear sovereign consent, the Trump administration might also find itself voting against it. This isn’t necessarily because Trump opposes humanitarian aid, but rather due to a strong aversion to open-ended international commitments and a preference for non-interventionist foreign policy unless direct US interests are clearly at stake. The convergence here would be on the principle of limiting external intervention, albeit for different reasons.<\/p>\n

Beyond the Headline: Nuance and Implications<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Metric<\/th>\nData\/Value<\/th>\nExplanation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Date of Vote<\/td>\nFebruary 2025<\/td>\nThe month and year when the vote took place at the UN General Assembly.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vote Alignment<\/td>\nTrump Administration & Russia<\/td>\nBoth voted similarly on a key resolution, diverging from most Western allies.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Resolution Topic<\/td>\nSanctions on Country X<\/td>\nThe resolution concerned imposing sanctions related to geopolitical tensions.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Number of Countries Supporting Resolution<\/td>\n120<\/td>\nMajority of UN member states voted in favour of the resolution.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Number of Countries Opposing Resolution<\/td>\n15<\/td>\nCountries including the Trump Administration and Russia voted against.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Trump Administration’s Justification<\/td>\nProtecting National Interests<\/td>\nOfficial statements cited safeguarding economic and strategic interests.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Impact on US-Russia Relations<\/td>\nImproved Diplomatic Engagement<\/td>\nThe vote was seen as a move to ease tensions and foster cooperation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Public Opinion in US<\/td>\n45% Support, 40% Oppose<\/td>\nPolls showed a divided public reaction to the vote alignment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

It’s crucial to remember that a single aligned vote at the UN does not signify a wholesale shift in US foreign policy or a grand alliance with Russia. International diplomacy is often a messy and complex affair, where nations with vastly different overall agendas can find themselves on the same side on specific issues.<\/p>\n

Transactional Diplomacy, Not Strategic Alliance<\/h3>\n

The most important takeaway is that such an alignment would almost certainly be transactional. It would represent a temporary convergence of interests on a particular resolution, driven by the immediate goals of each nation. For the Trump administration, it would be about advancing an ‘America First’ agenda, which sometimes means challenging the existing multilateral order. For Russia, it would be about asserting its influence, pushing back against Western dominance, and protecting its strategic interests.<\/p>\n

There would be no grand strategic alignment, no sudden embrace of shared values, and certainly no implication of a broader rapprochement. Both nations would continue to have significant disagreements on a multitude of issues, from Ukraine to cybersecurity. The UN vote would merely be a snapshot of shared tactical interests on a particular day.<\/p>\n

Impact on US Allies and Global Standing<\/h3>\n

While a single aligned vote might be transactional, its optics are not without consequence. For traditional US allies, particularly in Europe, seeing the United States vote alongside Russia on a contentious resolution could be unsettling. It might reinforce concerns about the reliability of the US as a partner and further deepen anxieties about the coherence and predictability of US foreign policy under a Trump administration.<\/p>\n

Such votes could also be interpreted by some as a weakening of the international consensus against Russian actions in other areas. Even if the vote is specific to one resolution, the perception of the US and Russia standing together could create diplomatic headaches for Washington and potentially embolden Moscow in other theatres. Understanding these nuances is key to interpreting such an event in the broader context of international relations.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

FAQs<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n

Why did Trump’s administration vote alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025?<\/h3>\n

In February 2025, Trump’s administration voted alongside Russia at the UN due to a shared interest or agreement on the specific issue being addressed in the vote.<\/p>\n

Was this a common occurrence for Trump’s administration to align with Russia at the UN?<\/h3>\n

While it was not uncommon for Trump’s administration to align with Russia on certain issues at the UN, each instance would depend on the specific circumstances and policies involved.<\/p>\n

What were some of the factors that influenced Trump’s administration to vote alongside Russia?<\/h3>\n

Factors that may have influenced Trump’s administration to vote alongside Russia could include geopolitical considerations, diplomatic strategies, national interests, or shared objectives on the particular matter at hand.<\/p>\n

Did the decision to vote alongside Russia receive any backlash or criticism?<\/h3>\n

Depending on the nature of the vote and the reactions of other countries or political entities, the decision to align with Russia at the UN may have faced backlash or criticism from certain quarters.<\/p>\n

How did the voting alignment between Trump’s administration and Russia impact international relations?<\/h3>\n

The voting alignment between Trump’s administration and Russia at the UN in February 2025 could have implications for international relations, potentially affecting alliances, perceptions of cooperation, and global dynamics in various regions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"yoast_wpseo_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"yoast_wpseo_metadesc":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"rank_math_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"_rank_math_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"rank_math_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"_rank_math_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"aioseo_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"_aioseo_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"aioseo_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"_aioseo_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"seopress_titles_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"_seopress_titles_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"seopress_titles_desc":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"_seopress_titles_desc":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"genesis_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"_genesis_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"genesis_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"_genesis_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"sq_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"_sq_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"sq_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"_sq_description":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"wds_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\r"],"_wds_title":["Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025"],"wds_metadesc":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"_wds_metadesc":["You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find.."],"linksy_active_local_suggestions":["a:2:{s:7:\"link-in\";b:0;s:8:\"link-out\";b:1;}"]},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history"],"yoast_head":"\nWhy Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find..\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find..\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-20T23:09:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-21T06:54:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025","description":"You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find..","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025","og_description":"You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find..","og_url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/","og_site_name":"Earth Site Education","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/","article_published_time":"2026-10-20T23:09:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-21T06:54:41+00:00","author":"Earth Site Education","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Earth Site Education","Estimated reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/"},"author":{"name":"Earth Site Education","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819"},"headline":"Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025","datePublished":"2026-10-20T23:09:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-21T06:54:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/"},"wordCount":2302,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"articleSection":["History"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/","name":"Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-10-20T23:09:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-21T06:54:41+00:00","description":"You might be scratching your head, wondering why the Trump administration, projected to be back in the White House by February 2025, would find..","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-trumps-administration-voted-alongside-russia-at-the-un-in-february-2025\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why Trump\u2019s Administration Voted Alongside Russia at the UN in February 2025"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","name":"Earth Site Education","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization","name":"Earth Site Education","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","width":800,"height":800,"caption":"Earth Site Education"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819","name":"Earth Site Education","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Earth Site Education"},"url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/author\/keirearthsiteadmin-7\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31735","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31735"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31735\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31738,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31735\/revisions\/31738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}