{"id":32896,"date":"2026-10-31T17:49:45","date_gmt":"2026-10-31T17:49:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/"},"modified":"2026-10-31T17:49:45","modified_gmt":"2026-10-31T17:49:45","slug":"the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/","title":{"rendered":"The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Fashoda Incident of 1898 brought Britain and France close to confrontation over control of the Upper Nile. A French expedition under Jean-Baptiste Marchand and an Anglo-Egyptian force commanded by Herbert Kitchener met in what is now South Sudan. Their encounter reveals how European imperial rivalry, African geography and decisions taken in distant capitals shaped borders without consulting the people who lived there.<\/p>\n<h2>Key takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>French and British imperial ambitions intersected at Fashoda on the White Nile in 1898.<\/li>\n<li>Marchand and Kitchener avoided fighting, leaving governments to resolve the dispute.<\/li>\n<li>French withdrawal reflected diplomatic and strategic calculations, not a popular vote in Sudan.<\/li>\n<li>The crisis helped reshape Anglo-French relations before the 1904 Entente Cordiale.<\/li>\n<li>Understanding the incident requires attention to African communities and the wider Mahdist War.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Why did Fashoda matter?<\/h2>\n<p>Fashoda was a small settlement on the White Nile, but in 1898 it became the meeting point of two large imperial ambitions. France hoped to extend its influence eastwards from territories in Central and West Africa. Britain wanted to secure the Nile valley and maintain a north\u2013south chain of influence between Egypt and eastern and southern Africa. Neither ambition originated in the wishes of local people. The apparent emptiness of imperial maps concealed communities with their own rulers, trade, livelihoods and histories.<\/p>\n<p>The confrontation mattered because the two European powers could have treated a disputed African settlement as a reason for war. Instead, officers on the ground behaved cautiously while their governments negotiated. Students studying the <a title=\"History of Sudan\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/history-of-sudan\/\">history of Sudan<\/a> can place this episode within a longer history of Nile states, Egyptian rule and colonial intervention rather than treating it as an isolated argument between London and Paris.<\/p>\n<h2>The Scramble for Africa and imperial maps<\/h2>\n<p>During the late nineteenth century European governments competed to claim territories across Africa. Their decisions combined economic hopes, military prestige, strategic transport routes and rivalry with other European powers. Maps displayed coloured blocks of territory, sometimes before officials had established effective control. A line drawn in a European ministry could cross pastoral routes, farms and political boundaries that local communities already understood.<\/p>\n<p>Britain\u2019s position in Egypt gave the Nile exceptional strategic significance. France, meanwhile, sought connections across the continent that could strengthen its diplomatic standing. It would be misleading to describe either country as pursuing one unchanging plan: governments argued internally over costs and priorities. The <a title=\"Victorian Britain: Empire, Industry, and Innovation\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/victorian-britain-empire-industry-and-innovation\/\">Victorian Britain and imperial expansion<\/a> article offers background on the wider mixture of industrial power, empire and political confidence that shaped British decision-making.<\/p>\n<h2>Sudan before the confrontation<\/h2>\n<p>The Upper Nile was not an ungoverned frontier waiting for European occupation. Sudan had been transformed by Egyptian expansion, local resistance and the Mahdist movement. Muhammad Ahmad\u2019s followers established a powerful state after revolting in 1881, and Khartoum fell in 1885. Britain and Egypt later organised a reconquest that culminated in the defeat of the main Mahdist army at Omdurman in September 1898.<\/p>\n<p>These events were central to Fashoda. Kitchener\u2019s advance followed a war involving Sudanese communities, Egyptian soldiers and British forces, not simply an expedition to challenge France. The <a title=\"The Mahdist War (1881\u20131899): Sudan, Khartoum and Omdurman\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/mahdist-war-1881-1899-sudan-khartoum-omdurman\/\">Mahdist War in Sudan<\/a> explains the origins and human consequences of that conflict. The French mission was moving into a region whose political future was being fought over by people who were not represented at the diplomatic negotiations.<\/p>\n<h2>Jean-Baptiste Marchand and the French expedition<\/h2>\n<p>Jean-Baptiste Marchand led a French mission across difficult Central African terrain towards the Upper Nile. Reaching Fashoda required long journeys, local labour, transport of supplies and negotiations with people along the route. Accounts that celebrate only European officers often overlook African soldiers, porters and guides whose work made the expedition possible. Their experiences were not identical: some participated willingly, while coercion was a feature of many colonial operations.<\/p>\n<p>The expedition reached Fashoda in July 1898 and raised a French claim. But arriving first did not settle sovereignty. Marchand\u2019s force was small and distant from reliable French supply lines. Its position depended on the willingness of the French government to sustain a claim against Britain, which could reach the area along the Nile using steamers and an army already operating in Sudan.<\/p>\n<h2>Kitchener reaches the Upper Nile<\/h2>\n<p>Herbert Kitchener commanded the Anglo-Egyptian army that defeated the Mahdist forces at Omdurman on 2 September 1898. His advance relied on river transport, railways, equipment and a much larger organised force. After the battle, he continued southwards and met Marchand\u2019s men at Fashoda in September. The meeting created an awkward situation: each commander represented a government asserting authority over the same place.<\/p>\n<p>Both sides recognised that an exchange of fire could have consequences far beyond Sudan. They therefore preserved their positions without initiating a battle. The episode demonstrates a distinction students should remember: military superiority may shape bargaining power, but diplomacy determines whether an armed encounter becomes an international war. The actions of commanders mattered, yet final decisions remained with politicians in Europe.<\/p>\n<h2>Why Britain and France did not fight<\/h2>\n<p>A war between Britain and France would have been expensive, politically dangerous and uncertain. Britain enjoyed substantial naval advantages and a stronger logistical position in the Nile valley. French leaders also had concerns about European security and relations with Germany. Foreign Minister Th\u00e9ophile Delcass\u00e9 increasingly judged that a confrontation over Fashoda offered fewer benefits than a negotiated retreat and a better long-term relationship with Britain.<\/p>\n<p>French public opinion included nationalist anger, and newspapers portrayed the dispute in dramatic terms. But public rhetoric was not the same as government strategy. Officials had to compare a symbolic imperial claim with the practical costs of military escalation. France ultimately ordered withdrawal in November 1898. The absence of battle should not hide the coercive nature of the wider colonial project: a peaceful European settlement still allocated power over African territory without African consent.<\/p>\n<h2>The diplomatic settlement and 1899 agreement<\/h2>\n<p>The immediate crisis ended when the French expedition withdrew. In March 1899 Britain and France agreed on spheres of influence in parts of northeast and central Africa. These arrangements were framed as solutions to rivalry between states, yet they depended on the premise that European powers could distribute political influence across territories inhabited by others. Formal agreements did not make the resulting system equitable or locally legitimate.<\/p>\n<p>The dispute also demonstrated that geographical knowledge could be used as a tool of empire. Rivers, watersheds, roads and proposed railways appeared in diplomatic arguments because they affected trade and military access. Students can compare a contemporary political map with a map of the Nile basin and ask which boundaries follow physical features and which reflect historical negotiation. The answer is rarely as simple as one straight line.<\/p>\n<h2>From rivalry towards the Entente Cordiale<\/h2>\n<p>The Fashoda Incident did not automatically create friendship between Britain and France. Suspicion continued, and colonial disputes remained. Nevertheless, the experience exposed the costs of confrontation and encouraged politicians to search for a more predictable relationship. The Entente Cordiale of 1904 settled several colonial questions and helped establish a new diplomatic understanding between the two powers.<\/p>\n<p>It is tempting to draw a straight line from Fashoda to later alliances in the First World War, but history is not predetermined. Germany\u2019s growing power, domestic politics and other diplomatic crises also influenced decisions. Fashoda was one important episode in a broader realignment. Its significance lies partly in showing how imperial competition abroad could affect the balance of power within Europe.<\/p>\n<h2>How did African people experience the crisis?<\/h2>\n<p>Most conventional narratives concentrate on Marchand, Kitchener and the ministers who exchanged messages. Yet people in the Upper Nile region faced immediate questions about authority, taxation, security, movement and access to resources. They had already experienced conflict and changing administrations. For them, a decision made in London or Paris could affect daily life without offering any meaningful representation in the process.<\/p>\n<p>A fuller account examines African political institutions, local alliances, forced labour and the consequences of military campaigns. Oral histories and regional scholarship can help correct the narrow perspective of official European documents. Historians should avoid assuming that every community responded in the same way. Some leaders negotiated, others resisted, and individuals often made difficult choices under unequal conditions.<\/p>\n<h2>Reading imperial sources critically<\/h2>\n<p>Newspapers, military reports, diplomatic correspondence and maps provide valuable evidence, but each has limitations. A newspaper might exaggerate danger to sell copies. An officer could minimise mistakes or present an encounter as a personal achievement. A colonial map might label a region as a possession even where effective control was weak. Comparing different sources helps reveal what the authors wanted readers to believe.<\/p>\n<p>Students can examine who produced a document, when it was written and which voices are absent. French and British descriptions may disagree about intentions, while Sudanese perspectives raise questions that neither government prioritised. Distinguishing an eyewitness account from later interpretation also matters. Historical accuracy improves when evidence is placed in context rather than repeated simply because it sounds dramatic.<\/p>\n<h2>A concise timeline of Fashoda<\/h2>\n<p>In the mid-1890s the French government supported a mission towards the Upper Nile while Britain and Egypt prepared a sustained reconquest of Sudan. Marchand\u2019s expedition reached Fashoda in July 1898. Kitchener defeated the Mahdist army at Omdurman on 2 September and arrived at Fashoda later that month. The commanders avoided armed conflict and referred the matter to their governments.<\/p>\n<p>In November 1898 France ordered withdrawal. An Anglo-French declaration in March 1899 clarified competing spheres of influence. The Entente Cordiale followed in 1904 as part of a broader diplomatic rapprochement. This sequence shows why a timeline should separate military events, government decisions and long-term consequences. They happened at different speeds and involved different people.<\/p>\n<h2>What the incident teaches about geopolitics<\/h2>\n<p>Fashoda demonstrates that geographical locations can become symbols of much larger ambitions. The settlement\u2019s value was not simply its population or buildings, but its position within competing visions of control over the Nile. It also shows that powerful states may calculate whether a symbolic victory is worth the cost of escalation. Diplomatic compromise can prevent war between those states while leaving injustices towards other populations unresolved.<\/p>\n<p>For modern comparisons, it is useful to ask who claims authority, which resources or routes matter, who is excluded from negotiations and what evidence supports competing accounts. The point is not that every modern dispute resembles Fashoda. It is that careful analysis distinguishes strategic interests, legal arguments, human consequences and the language governments use to justify their choices.<\/p>\n<h2>A map-reading exercise: competing imperial routes<\/h2>\n<p>Place a map of the Nile basin beside a late nineteenth-century map of European colonial claims. Trace the route from Egypt towards Sudan and compare it with a proposed French east\u2013west connection across central Africa. The crossing of these imagined corridors helps explain why Fashoda gained diplomatic importance. Yet the maps also show how little imperial lines tell us about the people living along rivers and trading routes.<\/p>\n<p>Students can annotate the maps with settlements, water sources and existing African political territories. They should ask who made each map and what its purpose was. A map designed to display imperial ambition is evidence of an ambition, not proof that the territory was legitimately controlled.<\/p>\n<h2>The costs of an imperial crisis<\/h2>\n<p>Even without a battle at Fashoda, expeditions consumed money, labour and supplies. Soldiers and porters travelled difficult routes, while communities encountered new demands from armed outsiders. Diplomatic tension could also affect trade and public opinion far from the Nile. These costs help explain why ministers weighed a symbolic claim against the risk of a much larger war.<\/p>\n<p>The incident is a reminder that avoiding one armed clash does not erase the violence of the surrounding colonial system. The Mahdist War had already caused enormous suffering. A historically responsible account should distinguish the absence of Anglo-French combat from the experiences of Sudanese people who faced conquest and coercion.<\/p>\n<h2>Could the outcome have been different?<\/h2>\n<p>Historians sometimes explore alternatives to clarify why a particular outcome occurred. If Marchand had received substantial reinforcements, or if French ministers had judged the claim essential, the bargaining position might have changed. Such possibilities cannot be treated as events that actually happened. They are useful only when grounded in the known constraints of logistics, naval power and diplomacy.<\/p>\n<p>A stronger question than \u201cWho would have won a war?\u201d is \u201cWhat conditions made compromise more attractive than escalation?\u201d This directs attention to evidence: the relative size of forces, government priorities and the broader European balance of power. It also prevents speculation from overshadowing the people whose territory was at stake.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>The Fashoda Incident was a diplomatic confrontation with consequences far beyond one settlement on the Nile. It revealed the limits of imperial ambition, the importance of logistics and the value of avoiding war, but also the unequal assumptions underlying European agreements about African territory. Understanding both the international negotiations and the Sudanese setting produces a more complete account of 1898.<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<h3>What was the Fashoda Incident?<\/h3>\n<p>It was a diplomatic crisis in 1898 after French and Anglo-Egyptian forces asserted competing claims at Fashoda on the Upper Nile.<\/p>\n<h3>Where was Fashoda?<\/h3>\n<p>Fashoda, now associated with Kodok, is in present-day South Sudan on the White Nile.<\/p>\n<h3>Did Britain and France fight a battle there?<\/h3>\n<p>No. The commanders avoided a direct battle, and the dispute was resolved through diplomatic pressure and French withdrawal.<\/p>\n<h3>Why did France withdraw?<\/h3>\n<p>French leaders judged that the military and diplomatic costs of sustaining the claim outweighed its benefits.<\/p>\n<h3>Why is it studied today?<\/h3>\n<p>It illustrates imperial rivalry, the role of geography and the exclusion of African voices from colonial border-making.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Fashoda Incident of 1898 brought Britain and France close to confrontation over control of the Upper Nile. A French expedition under Jean-Baptiste Marchand and an Anglo-Egyptian force commanded by Herbert Kitchener met in what is now South Sudan. Their encounter reveals how E<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_earthsite_chatgtp_hash":["fe8d11484fb30c11ad366c0ae30440823eef44423a9c9cf44ef18cea216fec3d"]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-generalknowledge"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa - Earth Site Education<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa - Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Fashoda Incident of 1898 brought Britain and France close to confrontation over control of the Upper Nile. A French expedition under Jean-Baptiste Marchand and an Anglo-Egyptian force commanded by Herbert Kitchener met in what is now South Sudan. Their encounter reveals how E\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-31T17:49:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa - Earth Site Education","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa - Earth Site Education","og_description":"The Fashoda Incident of 1898 brought Britain and France close to confrontation over control of the Upper Nile. A French expedition under Jean-Baptiste Marchand and an Anglo-Egyptian force commanded by Herbert Kitchener met in what is now South Sudan. Their encounter reveals how E","og_url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/","og_site_name":"Earth Site Education","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/","article_published_time":"2026-10-31T17:49:45+00:00","author":"Earth Site Education","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Earth Site Education","Estimated reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/"},"author":{"name":"Earth Site Education","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819"},"headline":"The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa","datePublished":"2026-10-31T17:49:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/"},"wordCount":2247,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"articleSection":["General Knowledge"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/","name":"The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa - Earth Site Education","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-10-31T17:49:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/the-fashoda-incident-of-1898-britain-france-and-the-scramble-for-africa\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Fashoda Incident of 1898: Britain, France and the Scramble for Africa"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","name":"Earth Site Education","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization","name":"Earth Site Education","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","width":800,"height":800,"caption":"Earth Site Education"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819","name":"Earth Site Education","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Earth Site Education"},"url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/author\/keirearthsiteadmin-7\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32896\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}