{"id":33483,"date":"2026-11-06T14:16:38","date_gmt":"2026-11-06T14:16:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/"},"modified":"2026-11-08T19:58:04","modified_gmt":"2026-11-08T19:58:04","slug":"why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated"},"content":{"rendered":"

Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by his former comrade Blaise Compaor\u00e9, this event was the culmination of mounting internal political tensions, significant regional destabilisation, and considerable external pressures from powerful Western nations and international financial institutions. Sankara\u2019s revolutionary anti-imperialist, self-sufficiency, and Pan-Africanist agenda directly challenged entrenched interests both within Burkina Faso and on the global stage, making him a perceived threat to various powerful actors.<\/p>\n

The Internal Power Struggle<\/h2>\n

The most immediate and direct cause of Sankara\u2019s assassination lay in the deteriorating relationship with his close friend and long-time comrade, Blaise Compaor\u00e9. Their bond, forged in military school and revolutionary ideals, began to fracture under the immense pressure of governance and ideological divergence.<\/p>\n

The Rise of Compaor\u00e9’s Dissatisfaction<\/h3>\n

Initially, Compaor\u00e9 was a key figure in the 1983 revolution that brought Sankara to power, serving as Minister of State at the Presidency and later as Minister of Justice. However, as Sankara consolidated his revolutionary vision, implementing radical reforms that often bypassed traditional power structures and challenged the status quo, Compaor\u00e9\u2019s influence began to wane in comparison, or at least he perceived it that way. Compaor\u00e9, arguably more pragmatic or perhaps less ideologically rigid than Sankara, started to voice concerns about the pace and direction of the revolution. He reportedly found Sankara\u2019s uncompromising stance on issues like the fight against corruption, the strict adherence to revolutionary ideals, and the often public denunciation of former allies, to be alienating and destabilising.<\/p>\n

The People’s Revolutionary Tribunals (TPRs), for instance, were a hallmark of Sankara’s anti-corruption drive, publicly trying former officials for embezzlement and economic crimes. While popular with the masses, these tribunals were deeply unpopular with elements of the old guard and some of Sankara’s contemporaries who felt exposed or threatened. Compaor\u00e9, who was not above reproach in the eyes of some, may have seen these as dangerous precedents.<\/p>\n

Ideological Divergences and Political Factions<\/h3>\n

Beyond personal grievances, there were fundamental ideological differences emerging between Sankara and Compaor\u00e9. Sankara was a fervent anti-imperialist, a committed Pan-Africanist, and an advocate for a socialist-oriented, self-reliant development model. He sought to radically break Burkina Faso free from its colonial past and the neocolonial grip of Western powers.<\/p>\n

Compaor\u00e9, on the other hand, was perceived by many as being more amenable to maintaining relations with France and other Western powers, and less committed to Sankara’s radical economic and social reforms. He was seen as representing a more conservative wing of the revolutionary movement, one that perhaps sought a more gradual approach or was simply more willing to compromise with external forces for the sake of stability or personal gain.<\/p>\n

These divergences manifested in policy debates and internal power struggles within the National Council for the Revolution (CNR). Sankara\u2019s vision often prioritised the collective over individual liberties in the name of revolutionary discipline and national development. This led to a concentration of power around Sankara himself, which was perceived as authoritarian by some within the leadership, including Compaor\u00e9. The constant purges and reshuffles within the government and military, designed by Sankara to root out corruption and consolidate revolutionary power, inadvertently created a climate of insecurity and resentment among those who felt targeted or sidelined.<\/p>\n

The creation of the Committees for the Defence of the Revolution (CDRs) was another point of contention. While intended to mobilise the populace and act as local revolutionary organs, they were sometimes accused of excesses and became instruments of surveillance and control. Compaor\u00e9 and his allies may have viewed these structures as eroding the authority of the state and military, and as a potential threat to their own positions.<\/p>\n

The Breakdown of Trust<\/h3>\n

The final months leading up to the assassination were marked by a severe breakdown of trust between Sankara and Compaor\u00e9. Reports suggest that mutual suspicions were high. Sankara himself was aware of plots against him, though he often downplayed the risks, believing in the power of their shared history and revolutionary bond.<\/p>\n

Compaor\u00e9, meanwhile, was actively consolidating support among elements of the military who were disgruntled with Sankara\u2019s reforms, particularly those affecting their privileges or traditional hierarchical structures. The military, though instrumental in the revolution, was also a conservative force that Sankara sought to transform. His efforts to democratise the armed forces and link them more closely with the populace were not universally welcomed by the officer corps.<\/p>\n

The escalating tensions culminated in Compaor\u00e9’s coup, which, while presented as a necessary measure to “rectify the revolution” and prevent civil war, was clearly a violent seizure of power that removed Sankara from the political landscape entirely. The assassination was not just a side effect of the coup; it was central to it, ensuring that Sankara’s ideological challenge and popular appeal would be permanently silenced.<\/p>\n

Regional Destabilisation and Rivalries<\/h2>\n

Sankara’s radical agenda extended beyond Burkina Faso’s borders, directly challenging established regional dynamics and igniting rivalries with neighbouring states. His outspoken anti-imperialist stance and commitment to Pan-Africanism made him an uncomfortable presence for many leaders in the West African sub-region, particularly those with strong ties to former colonial powers.<\/p>\n

The “Brotherhood” of African Leaders<\/h3>\n

Many African leaders, particularly those who had been in power for decades and maintained close relationships with France, viewed Sankara with suspicion and discomfort. His revolutionary rhetoric, which called for genuine independence and self-reliance, implicitly criticised their own governance models and their perceived subservience to Western interests.<\/p>\n

Sankara’s public denunciations of corruption, lavish spending, and neocolonial policies resonated with ordinary Africans across the continent, but threatened the entrenched elites. For leaders like F\u00e9lix Houphou\u00ebt-Boigny of C\u00f4te d’Ivoire, a long-time ally of France, Sankara was a dangerous disruptor. Houphou\u00ebt-Boigny, often referred to as “the Old Man of Africa,” saw Sankara’s influence as potentially destabilising his own carefully constructed political and economic order, which relied heavily on French support and regional dominance.<\/p>\n

There was a palpable fear among some regional leaders that Sankara’s revolution could inspire similar movements in their own countries, potentially leading to widespread unrest and challenges to their authority. This made them receptive to any efforts, internal or external, that sought to neutralise Sankara’s influence.<\/p>\n

Border Disputes and Regional Alliances<\/h3>\n

Burkina Faso’s relationship with Mali was particularly strained due to a long-standing border dispute<\/a> over the Agacher Strip, a resource-rich area. While a truce was eventually brokered, the underlying tensions and occasional armed clashes contributed to a climate of instability in the region. These disputes, often manipulated by external powers, could be used to justify increased military presence or intervention, further complicating regional security.<\/p>\n

Sankara’s efforts to forge new alliances and strengthen Pan-African solidarity were also perceived as a threat by some. He sought to create a united front against neocolonialism and advocated for greater regional economic integration that was not dictated by external powers. This challenged existing regional blocs and alliances that were often seen as serving the interests of former colonial masters.<\/p>\n

The regional context<\/a> was therefore ripe for destabilisation. Sankara\u2019s uncompromising vision for a truly independent Africa often put him at odds with the established order, making him a target for those who benefited from the existing power structures and allegiances. His assassination can be seen, in part, as an attempt to restore a perceived “balance” in the region, a balance that largely favoured conservative, pro-Western regimes.<\/p>\n

External Pressures and Neo-Colonial Interests<\/h2>\n

While internal and regional factors played a critical role, the shadow of external influence loomed large over Sankara’s Burkina Faso. His radical anti-imperialist stance directly challenged the interests of powerful Western nations, particularly France, and international financial institutions.<\/p>\n

France’s Enduring Influence<\/h3>\n

France, as the former colonial power, maintained significant economic, political, and cultural influence over its former territories in West Africa, often referred to as “Fran\u00e7afrique.” This network of informal and formal ties ensured French dominance in the region, including control over strategic resources and markets.<\/p>\n

Sankara’s policies were a direct affront to this established order. He vocally denounced the neocolonial relationship, advocating for true economic independence. He challenged the CFA franc currency, which was pegged to the French franc (and later the Euro), seeing it as a tool of French economic control that limited Burkina Faso’s monetary sovereignty. He encouraged local production and consumption, aiming to reduce reliance on imported goods from France and other Western countries.<\/p>\n

His famous speech at the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) in 1987, where he called for African nations to collectively refuse to pay their foreign debts, was a seismic event. This proposal directly threatened the financial interests of Western banks and international institutions, which saw debt as a crucial lever of control over developing nations. Such a unified stance, if successful, would have fundamentally altered the global financial landscape and significantly weakened the influence of Western powers.<\/p>\n

French intelligence and political networks in the region were extensive, and it is highly improbable that they were unaware of the plots against Sankara. While direct proof of French complicity in the assassination remains elusive, many analysts and historians argue that France benefited significantly from Sankara’s removal. His successor, Blaise Compaor\u00e9, quickly re-established cordial relations with France, reversed many of Sankara’s radical policies, and became a reliable ally of Paris in the region for decades.<\/p>\n

International Financial Institutions and Debt Relief<\/h3>\n

Sankara\u2019s unwavering stance against foreign debt and his push for self-reliance also put him on a collision course with institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. These organisations typically impose stringent structural adjustment programs (SAPs) on developing countries in exchange for loans. These programs often include austerity measures, privatisation of state assets, and liberalisation of markets, which critics argue primarily benefit Western corporations and financial interests.<\/p>\n

Sankara famously rejected these externally imposed conditions, arguing that they perpetuated a cycle of dependence and poverty. He instead advocated for internal solutions, mobilising his population to build infrastructure, implement health campaigns, and pursue agricultural self-sufficiency using local resources. This approach, while empowering for Burkinab\u00e8, was anathema to the prevailing economic orthodoxy promoted by the IMF and World Bank. His success, if sustained, could have provided an alternative model for other developing nations, thereby undermining the authority and business model of these powerful institutions.<\/p>\n

The refusal to pay debt and the pursuit of an independent development path were not just economic policies; they were acts of defiance against a global system designed to maintain the economic dominance of the powerful. Sankara, therefore, became a symbol of resistance against this system, making him a target for those who sought to preserve it.<\/p>\n

The Cold War Context<\/h3>\n

It’s also important to remember the broader context of the Cold War. While Sankara was not aligned with either the Soviet or American blocs in a traditional sense \u2013 he was a true non-aligned leader who criticised both capitalist and Soviet-style imperialism \u2013 his socialist rhetoric and anti-Western stance made him appear more sympathetic to the Eastern Bloc in the eyes of the West.<\/p>\n

Any leader in a strategically important region who challenged Western hegemony during the Cold War was viewed with suspicion and often faced destabilisation efforts. While Sankara was not a Soviet puppet, his independent and revolutionary path was perceived as potentially tilting the regional balance of power away from Western interests, further solidifying the view that he needed to be neutralised. The Cold War provided a convenient backdrop for powerful nations to justify interventions or support regime change in countries perceived as threats to their geopolitical influence.<\/p>\n

Sankara’s Uncompromising Vision<\/h2>\n

At the heart of why Thomas Sankara was assassinated lay his unwavering commitment to a radical and uncompromising vision for Burkina Faso and, by extension, for Africa. His principles, while inspiring to many, were inherently destabilising to established orders and powerful interests.<\/p>\n

Anti-Imperialism and Self-Reliance<\/h3>\n

Sankara’s core philosophy was rooted in anti-imperialism. He believed that true independence for African nations could only be achieved by severing the neocolonial ties that bound them to former colonial powers and other dominant global actors. This wasn’t merely rhetoric; he implemented policies to match. He rejected foreign aid that came with strings attached, viewing it as a tool for control rather than genuine development. Instead, he mobilised the Burkinab\u00e8 population to undertake ambitious development projects, from building railways and roads to planting millions of trees to combat desertification, all using local resources and labour.<\/p>\n

His famous declaration, “Let’s consume what we produce, and produce what we consume,” epitomised his commitment to self-reliance. This approach directly threatened the markets and export opportunities of Western nations and challenged the prevailing economic model that kept African countries as raw material producers and consumers of manufactured goods from the Global North. By prioritising local production, he aimed to build a robust internal economy, reduce dependency on external markets, and retain wealth within the country. This was a direct challenge to the fundamental tenets of global capitalism as it was then (and largely still is) structured.<\/p>\n

Pan-Africanism and African Unity<\/h3>\n

Sankara was a fervent Pan-Africanist, advocating for greater unity and solidarity among African nations to collectively challenge global injustices. His call for a united front to reject foreign debt was a powerful manifestation of this belief. He envisioned an Africa that could stand together, negotiate as a bloc, and assert its sovereignty on the global stage, rather than individual nations being picked off and exploited.<\/p>\n

This vision was threatening to any external power that benefited from a divided and disempowered Africa. It also challenged the individualistic and often self-serving approaches of many African leaders who preferred to maintain bilateral ties with former colonial masters rather than embrace a more collective, potentially confrontational, stance. Sankara’s Pan-Africanism was not merely cultural; it was an economic and political strategy for liberation that demanded a radical shift in continental relations.<\/p>\n

Social Justice and Corruption Fight<\/h3>\n

Within Burkina Faso, Sankara\u2019s commitment to social justice was paramount. He launched extensive campaigns for education, healthcare, and women’s rights. He redistributed land to peasants, implemented nationwide vaccination programs, built schools, and declared a war on corruption. The People’s Revolutionary Tribunals, while controversial, were a bold attempt to hold powerful individuals accountable.<\/p>\n

These reforms, however, inevitably created enemies. The land reforms alienated traditional chiefs and landowners. The anti-corruption drive targeted elements within the military, bureaucracy, and business community who had long benefited from patronage and illicit gains. His efforts to elevate women’s status challenged deep-seated patriarchal norms and were met with resistance in some quarters.<\/p>\n

Sankara\u2019s insistence on austerity and revolutionary discipline also affected the privileges of the elite, including aspects of the military. He reportedly drove a modest Renault 5, wore locally made cotton, and refused to allow air conditioning in his office, setting a powerful example of living within the nation’s means. This stood in stark contrast to the often opulent lifestyles of leaders and officials in many developing countries, including his neighbours. While this endeared him to the masses, it alienated those who felt their status and entitlements were being undermined. His uncompromising moral stance made him a powerful leader, but also a deeply unpopular figure among those who preferred to maintain their privileges and wealth.<\/p>\n

The Immediate Coup and Aftermath<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Factor<\/th>\nDescription<\/th>\nImpact on Assassination<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Political Reforms<\/td>\nThomas Sankara implemented radical leftist reforms including land redistribution, nationalisation of resources, and anti-corruption measures.<\/td>\nThreatened established elites and foreign interests, creating powerful enemies.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Foreign Relations<\/td>\nSankara opposed neo-colonialism and sought to reduce dependence on Western countries, promoting pan-Africanism.<\/td>\nAlienated Western governments and multinational corporations.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Military Opposition<\/td>\nSome factions within the military were dissatisfied with Sankara’s policies and leadership style.<\/td>\nLed to internal conspiracies culminating in the coup and assassination.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Economic Policies<\/td>\nFocus on self-sufficiency and austerity measures to reduce foreign debt and improve local production.<\/td>\nCaused friction with international financial institutions and local business elites.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Popular Support<\/td>\nSankara enjoyed significant grassroots support but faced opposition from traditional power structures.<\/td>\nPopular backing was insufficient to prevent his overthrow.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987 was not an accidental outcome of a chaotic coup but a deliberate act central to the seizure of power by Blaise Compaor\u00e9. The events of that day effectively ended the Burkinab\u00e8 revolution and plunged the nation into a new era.<\/p>\n

The Orchestration of the Coup<\/h3>\n

On the fateful day, Sankara was reportedly attending a meeting at the National Council for the Revolution (CNR) headquarters in Ouagadougou. Forces loyal to Blaise Compaor\u00e9, heavily armed, surrounded the building. Details of the exact moments leading to his death remain contested and shrouded in some secrecy due to the subsequent decades of suppression under Compaor\u00e9’s regime. However, it is widely accepted that Sankara, along with 12 other officials present at the meeting, was summarily executed. Their bodies were reportedly riddled with bullets, indicating a violent and decisive operation.<\/p>\n

The official narrative initially put forth by Compaor\u00e9’s regime was that Sankara had attempted to flee during an “unfortunate incident,” or that he was killed in a chaotic shootout. This narrative has been consistently refuted by eyewitness accounts and later investigations, which strongly suggest a planned assassination. Sankara and his comrades were executed on the spot, their bodies quickly buried in unmarked graves, and the site secured to prevent any immediate investigation.<\/p>\n

The Suppression of the Revolution<\/h3>\n

Immediately following the assassination, Blaise Compaor\u00e9 seized control, announcing the formation of a new government and proclaiming to “rectify” the revolution, implying that Sankara had deviated from its original path. In reality, what followed was a swift and systematic dismantling of Sankara’s legacy and policies.<\/p>\n

The Committees for the Defence of the Revolution (CDRs) were dissolved or severely curtailed. The People’s Revolutionary Tribunals were disbanded. Many of Sankara’s key allies and supporters were arrested, exiled, or themselves assassinated in subsequent purges. The emphasis on self-reliance and anti-imperialism was abandoned in favour of rapprochement with France and international financial institutions. Compaor\u00e9 quickly entered into agreements with the IMF and World Bank, reopening the door to foreign investment and aid, often under terms that Sankara had vehemently rejected.<\/p>\n

The nationalisation policies were reversed, and state-owned enterprises were privatised. The distinctive cultural symbols of Sankara’s era, such as the wearing of local cotton, were subtly discouraged or simply faded away. The name “Burkina Faso” (Land of Upright People), which Sankara had proudly bestowed upon the country, remained, but its revolutionary spirit was extinguished.<\/p>\n

The Long Quest for Justice<\/h3>\n

For decades, the circumstances surrounding Sankara’s death were largely suppressed under Compaor\u00e9’s 27-year rule. Families of the victims and human rights advocates persistently called for an investigation and the exhumation of the bodies.<\/p>\n

It was only after Blaise Compaor\u00e9 himself was overthrown by a popular uprising in October 2014 that the path to justice began to clear. In 2015, a new transitional government authorised the exhumation of what were believed to be Sankara’s remains. Forensic analysis, while not definitively conclusive due to the state of the remains, indicated multiple bullet wounds, consistent with an execution.<\/p>\n

In 2021, a military tribunal in Burkina Faso formally charged Blaise Compaor\u00e9 (in absentia, as he had fled to C\u00f4te d’Ivoire) and several others with complicity in Sankara’s murder. In April 2022, Compaor\u00e9 was convicted in absentia and sentenced to life imprisonment. While this conviction brought some measure of justice, it largely confirmed what many had long suspected: that the assassination was a deliberate act by those who sought to dismantle Sankara’s revolution and consolidate power for themselves, often with the tacit approval or direct support of powerful external actors. The trial itself highlighted the extensive network of individuals involved and the carefully planned nature of the coup and assassination.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

FAQs<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n

Who was Thomas Sankara?<\/h3>\n

Thomas Sankara was a Burkinab\u00e9 military officer and revolutionary who served as the President of Burkina Faso from 1983 until his assassination in 1987. He is often referred to as “Africa’s Che Guevara” for his radical policies and efforts to promote self-sufficiency, anti-imperialism, and social justice in his country.<\/p>\n

What were the main policies implemented by Thomas Sankara?<\/h3>\n

Sankara implemented a range of progressive policies aimed at improving the lives of the Burkinab\u00e9 people. These included land reforms, the promotion of women’s rights, vaccination campaigns, and initiatives to combat deforestation. He also sought to reduce reliance on foreign aid and encouraged local production and self-sufficiency.<\/p>\n

What were the circumstances surrounding Thomas Sankara’s assassination?<\/h3>\n

Thomas Sankara was assassinated on October 15, 1987, during a coup led by his former ally Blaise Compaor\u00e9. The coup was reportedly motivated by Sankara’s radical reforms and his growing isolation from traditional power structures, both domestically and internationally. His assassination marked a significant turning point in Burkina Faso’s political landscape.<\/p>\n

Who was involved in the assassination of Thomas Sankara?<\/h3>\n

The assassination was orchestrated by Blaise Compaor\u00e9, who had been a close associate of Sankara. Following the coup, Compaor\u00e9 became the new president and ruled Burkina Faso for 27 years. There have been various allegations regarding the involvement of foreign powers, particularly France, which had interests in the region and was reportedly unhappy with Sankara’s policies.<\/p>\n

What is Thomas Sankara’s legacy today?<\/h3>\n

Thomas Sankara is remembered as a symbol of anti-colonialism and pan-Africanism. His legacy continues to inspire movements for social justice and political change across Africa. Many view him as a martyr for his ideals, and his policies are often cited as a model for sustainable development and empowerment in the continent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"yoast_wpseo_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"yoast_wpseo_metadesc":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"rank_math_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"_rank_math_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"rank_math_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"_rank_math_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"aioseo_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"_aioseo_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"aioseo_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"_aioseo_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"seopress_titles_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"_seopress_titles_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"seopress_titles_desc":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"_seopress_titles_desc":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"genesis_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"_genesis_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"genesis_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"_genesis_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"sq_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"_sq_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"sq_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"_sq_description":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"wds_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\r"],"_wds_title":["Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated"],"wds_metadesc":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"_wds_metadesc":["Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by.."],"linksy_active_local_suggestions":["a:2:{s:7:\"link-in\";b:0;s:8:\"link-out\";b:1;}"]},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33483","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history"],"yoast_head":"\nWhy Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by..\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by..\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-06T14:16:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-08T19:58:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Earth Site Education\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated","description":"Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by..","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated","og_description":"Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by..","og_url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/","og_site_name":"Earth Site Education","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/","article_published_time":"2026-11-06T14:16:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-11-08T19:58:04+00:00","author":"Earth Site Education","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Earth Site Education","Estimated reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/"},"author":{"name":"Earth Site Education","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819"},"headline":"Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated","datePublished":"2026-11-06T14:16:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-08T19:58:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/"},"wordCount":3593,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"articleSection":["History"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/","name":"Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-11-06T14:16:38+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-08T19:58:04+00:00","description":"Many factors converged to bring about the assassination of Thomas Sankara on 15 October 1987. While the immediate cause was a coup orchestrated by..","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/why-thomas-sankara-was-assassinated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why Thomas Sankara Was Assassinated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","name":"Earth Site Education","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#organization","name":"Earth Site Education","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/LogoYouTube.png","width":800,"height":800,"caption":"Earth Site Education"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/people\/Earth-Site-Education\/61556359432402\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/#\/schema\/person\/f028ca91f88fe2e9e578f24056a12819","name":"Earth Site Education","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/93795f5d72a690673db58fc60779e6bb369542d93350bb5432476175ff04c468?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Earth Site Education"},"url":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/author\/keirearthsiteadmin-7\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33483","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33483"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33483\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33945,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33483\/revisions\/33945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33483"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33483"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earth-site.co.uk\/Education\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33483"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}